Sport design: Reasoning on the mission and lifeless factors of historical past, and so forth.

Are there frames to motive about questions equivalent to: Given my search and degree design, is it assured that for any mixture of gamers elections there is no such thing as a means that the participant is blocked when finishing the sport?

For example, suppose a mission like this:

• The participant can betray NPC a and obtain Article b of NPC b As a reward, both
• The participant can betray NPC b and obtain Article a of NPC a As a reward.
• The participant can change Article a both b For a key. That is the one approach to get hold of key.
• Solely the key Open a brand new space. That is the one approach to enter space.
• The participant can kill NPC a. When he dies, NPC a It doesn’t fall Article a.

With this configuration, the participant can They’re blocked to finish the sport In the event that they kill NPC a and betray NPC b. On this case, they can’t get hold of Article a neither b As a reward, subsequently, by no means get key, And by no means enter space.

Now take a look at these two extra guidelines:

1. If you happen to kill, NPC a drops Article a.
2. The one approach to kill NPC a It’s by a component that may solely be obtained from space.

Including any of those choices / restrictions ensures that the participant can by no means lock himself to finish the sport.

If I wanted a time to learn these guidelines, then it signifies that at the least it’s a bit tough to motive about them, though that is only a very small instance. For any sensible variety of choices, limitations, NPC, parts and branches of missions, we’re prone to overlook a possible path by which the participant ends in essentially the most irritating scenario: not having the ability to full the sport and probably discover this solely too late.

How do folks motive about such issues? I think about coding helpful info in my descriptors of missions, parts, and so forth., convert every part into some sort of large state machine and validate computationally that there aren’t any lifeless ends. Or I can convert all choices and limitations into PROLOGY clauses and confirm satisfaction. Each appears possible however costly to construct just for a recreation.

How do research do that? Are there current frames? Qa with out finish and ready for the very best? Leaving Beta testers?