There may be nothing particular in “switch” provides on 1nt that differentiate them from providing demand immediately, when it comes to safety.
Clearly, transfers permit a second provide after the switch is accepted, which results in extra sequences; Transfers permit the NT starter to play the hand (which, with a powerful NT, is usually a bonus) … however as for “why would you play within the swimsuit as an alternative of 1T”, regardless of in case you ‘ Re provide 2 ♦ Play 2 ♥ or if you’re providing 2 ♥ What accomplice ought to approve.
So, the query is: “How weak can your swimsuit be to desire to play within the swimsuit to play 1nt?” And in addition, “are there higher methods to succeed in a ‘finest contract than 1nt’?”
Usually, an essential 5-2 adjustment (which might be 5-3 or higher, however suppose the worst) will play higher in 2 of that swimsuit than in 1nt, more often than not. There are two causes for this:
- Lengthy triumphs at all times take methods; In 1nt it’s essential to have an entry to them after establishing them.
- Lengthy triumphs are additionally stops for his or her lengthy costumes; In 1nt they solely inform the excessive playing cards.
As you possibly can see, in each circumstances, we’re involved concerning the palms the place the respondent is just not sturdy (so there aren’t any assured exterior entries and few births/births). Palms the place the respondent has some energy, we are going to switch and invite (or a sport of provides) in NT with solely 5, as a result of with values that count on to do 8 or 9 methods, you’ll actually solely see higher outcomes (extra often) with the Magic 5 -3 Match. Observe: This is a crucial blind spot for a lot of weak gamers (ER): they’re transferred and invited to their swimsuit with solely 5, and don’t perceive why that’s incorrect.
Now, additionally keep in mind that normal methods can’t play in 2 of a minor immediately; The most cost effective place to play in a minor is the extent of three. Now, your swimsuit has to say 2 methods greater than in NT solely to succeed in the equilibrium level. Normally, with out exterior playing cards, that may be a 6 -card swimsuit, however the hand within the OP is So unhealthy that even 5 and a Singleton hopes to take greater than 2 golf equipment if he triumphs, and zero
In nt.
However that’s an exception: even with ♠ Kxx as an alternative of qxx, or ♠ qjx ♦ x, there may be the likelihood that golf equipment can configure and be executable, or at the very least, it helps the demand of your accomplice or blocks the second swimsuit of opponents. If you happen to do, 1nt can do, or within the worst case be out of 1, however 3 ♣ just one extra trick is worse.
That stated, there’s a higher name with its 4 = 4 = 4 = 4 than the switch; Stayman Sure, if the accomplice provides 2 ♦ He is not going to be completely happy (and can most likely falsify being 4 = 5 within the aged and provide 2 ♥), however will attain a 4-4 adjustment if he has one.
Within the feedback, we’ve got “anticipate opponents to double and run then.” And sure, that works often: you possibly can contact the adjustment 4-3 or 4-4 with the Ruffs of the Singleton. In 2 ♠ he doubled as an alternative of 1nt doubled. And that’s 200, susceptible, even exterior of 1. In the event that they keep instantly, they might provide, they could not double it; They might not duplicate double with “playing cards” of the way in which they will double the 1NT.
Keep in mind, one of the best end result with this unhealthy hand against 1nt is that they play the misfit 20-20; After that’s to play an adjustment and, hopefully, do it; Then enjoying an adjustment that goes down; Then play 1nt that actually reduces. 200 known as Matchpoint’s dying rating for a cause.
- That stated, the worst demand through which I’ve transferred was ♦ 8xx. Now, a number of particular conditions have been utilized:
- We have been enjoying an NT 12-14. He had a depend of two. I might make a name of two ♣ that “might need to play 2 ♦, or you possibly can have one in all a number of
- Invitational or GF
palms, with or with out diamonds. “
It was in a match of the Swiss groups in opposition to one of the best or the second finest pair within the room, whom they knew that they performed double penalty of 1nt in equilibrium; However once more, it couldn’t have a double of “letters” of our so -called Keri 2 ♣. May have passed by numbers, in fact; However I knew we have been -800 or extra the place we performed it after Lho needed to duplicate 1nt; It was potential that we might exit with out issues if I requested me now. (LHO determined to magnify my 2 ♣, and reached 3nt by -1 when he performed it higher than our teammates).
